| The
Demonising of Islam Press
Gazette Online
Posted 17 October 2002 00:00 GMT
Whoever is responsible for these dreadful, wanton attacks, we condemn
them utterly.
No
cause can justify this carnage. We hope those responsible will swiftly be brought
to justice for their unconscionable deeds. This
was the press release issued by The Muslim Council of Britain within three hours
of the September 11 attacks last year. Within 48 hours, the council had organised
a well-attended press conference where all the main Muslim leaders from around
the UK signed a statement declaring that the attacks were morally indefensible
and called on those who had planned them to be brought to justice - an act referred
to by the Prime Minister the following day. By
the early evening of September 11, however, the MCB had already started receiving
what proved to be a very long stream of hatemail. Here is a typical, anonymous,
example: The rest of the world will now join to smash your filthy disease
infested Islam. You must be removed from great [sic] Britain in body bags. The
media only fuelled this fear of Islam. Large sections of it, instead of giving
column inches to the mainstream British Muslim voice, irresponsibly went to a
tiny fringe element with minuscule support to allow them to widely air their unrepresentative
views. Out of more than 800 UK mosques, only one, Finsbury Park in London, was
run by a known radical. Yet this mosque received more media coverage
than all the rest put together. Very little attempt was made to explain that these
radicals had no standing in the wider Muslim community. The situation
was akin to taking a member of the racist British National Party and saying his
views were representative of ordinary Britons. After
deliberately seeking out and courting fringe figures and printing their reckless
and inflammatory comments, the newspapers ran outraged follow-up pieces by columnists
and writers who were given free rein to demonise the Islamic faith and its followers. Indeed,
there appeared to be a symbiotic relationship between large sections of the media
and these radicals with both sides feeding off each other. This has
no doubt contributed to the pervasive feelings of suspicion towards the media
in the Muslim community. Ordinary Muslims were in a no-win situation. Daily
Telegraph defence editor Sir John Keegan mused over the way Western and Muslim
Oriental people conducted war. Whereas Westerners fought according
to rules of honour, he said, Orientals, by contrast, shrink
from pitched battle, which they often deride as a sort of game, preferring ambush,
surprise, treachery and deceit as the best way to overcome an enemy. This war
[in Afghanistan] belongs within the much larger spectrum of a far older conflict
between settled, creative productive Westerners and predatory, destructive Orientals.
Christian polemicist Patrick Sookhdeo alleged: Christianity does not justify
the use of all forms of violence. Islam does. This type of disparaging journalism
only led to inflaming the prejudice of Islamophobia against British Muslims. The
MCB began to receive reports of mosques being despoiled. A Bolton mosque was fire-bombed
while there were children inside performing their prayers. Muslim cemeteries were
vandalised and desecrated. In Swindon, a 19-year-old Muslim woman wearing a headscarf
was chased and hit hard on the head with a baseball bat. In London, an Afghan
cab driver was left paralysed from the neck down after being beaten with a bottle
and then punched and kicked by three men. In Exeter, pigs heads were thrown
into the car park of the local mosque and a banner was erected saying, The
blood of the American people is on the hands of every Muslim. Nuke em, George. From
all over the country, the story was the same: ordinary British Muslims were paying
the price for a terrorist crime in which they were in no way involved and for
which they were not responsible. Into
this combustible mix now stepped the BNP advocating a Campaign To Keep Britain
Free of Islam. Its leader Nick Griffin described Islam as a religion that
brings communal conflict, civil war and death to every country in which
it gets a foothold. Unlike
Jews and Sikhs, British Muslims - the UKs biggest minority community - are
not classified as a race and hence are not protected by the 1976 Race Relations
Act. Twenty years on, the BNP, recognising this gap in the law, has abandoned
its crude racist rhetoric and has reformulated it into a more socially acceptable
and wholly lawful anti-Muslim diatribe. By
the end of September 2001, in a bid to redress the imbalance in reporting, the
MCB wrote to the BBC, ITN and Sky urging them to give greater coverage to mainstream
Muslim voices. The MCB also met the editors and senior staff from the Daily Mail,
The Times, The Independent and Londons Evening Standard to convey the same
message. By
this time it was evident that the US was determined to start bombing Afghanistan
at the earliest opportunity. Various newspaper polls had found that around 80
per cent of British Muslims were opposed to a war with Afghanistan. Most were
deeply concerned that a war would lead to very heavy losses among civilians who
were entirely blameless. Enormous
media exposure was given to the news that a handful of British Muslims had decided
to make their way to Afghanistan to help resist the expected US invasion. Instead
of contextualising this news by pointing out that most British Muslims had chosen
to express their opposition to the war through peaceful means, the coverage in
some quarters seemed almost designed to stir up violence against British Muslims.
Large sections of the media engaged in a deliberate and incendiary policy of exaggeration
and scaremongering that was certain to contribute towards inciting a hatred of
mainstream British Muslims. Melanie
Phillips led the pack: We have a fifth column in our midst... Thousands
of alienated young Muslims, most of them born and bred here but who regard themselves
as an army within, are waiting for an opportunity to help to destroy the society
that sustains them. We now stare into the abyss, aghast. Robert Kilroy-Silk
wrote of the Moslem problem and of the enemy within. Carol
Sarler regretted that British Muslims had been treated with tolerance,
adding: It is this tolerance that, I fear, is going to bite us. It is the
same tolerance that allows an indigenous population to host another that hates
us and says so, in loud, haranguing, roving gangs that terrorise our inner cities
in the name of Allah. In
an ITN news bulletin, reporter Terry Lloyd described the Muslim cities of Islamabad,
Cairo and Istanbul as the terrorist capitals of the world. ITN later
apologised to the Muslim community for the use of this offensive phrase. As Palestinian
academic Edward Said once observed, malicious generalisations about Islam have
become the last acceptable form of denigration of foreign culture in the West. Since
the Runnymede Trust published its 1997 report Islamophobia - a challenge for us
all, there has been no shortage of evidence concerning the widespread extent of
discrimination that British Muslims now face every day. The Home Office-commissioned
report Religious Discrimination in England and Wales 2000, by the University of
Derby, and this years detailed report from the European Monitoring Centre
on Racism and Xenophobia both presented overwhelming evidence of Islamophobia.
Yet still we find Josie Appleton on the Spiked Online website saying there is
little sign of the predicted wave of bile, beatings and hatemailÉ
Indeed, it is probably all the hype about Islamophobia that encouraged many Muslims
to report such minor incidents in the first place. Despite
all this, there were some hopeful signs. In a supportive two-page spread The Sun
declared that Islam is not an evil religion and urged Britons to be
more sensitive to Muslim concerns about stereotyping. The Daily Telegraph published
a 16-page supplement to inform its readers about basic Islamic beliefs and teachings,
while The Guardian ran a week-long Muslim Britain series which was perhaps the
most extensive and positive look at the British Muslim community to have appeared
in a UK national newspaper. The Daily Mirror, under editor Piers Morgan, underwent
a remarkable transformation after September 11 and began a move away from celebrity/trivia-driven
features towards more serious journalism. This proved to be quite beneficial in
relation to its coverage of Islam and Muslims in general. A further welcome step
has been the move by the Daily Express to use the spelling Muslim
rather than Moslem, after representations from the MCB in July 2002.
The latter perverse spelling is prevalent in a number of papers and the MCB intends
to pursue the matter. Channel
4s short season of programmes on British Muslims in March 2002 did not receive
the enthusiastic welcome given to the BBCs British Islam season in August
2001. This was perhaps because the BBC, unlike Channel 4, had done its groundwork
and taken time to establish links with the Muslim community to organise complementary
off-air activities. The
British Muslim community has attracted an enormous amount of attention since September
11. It has had to come to terms with media and political scrutiny placing it firmly
in the limelight. But the Muslim community is a resilient one and has coped pretty
well with the pressure in the past year. It has taken important steps to correct
misconceptions of Islam and the assumption that Islam in Britain is something
of a perennial outsider. That
the Muslim community is an integral part of pluralist Britain should by now be
recognised. The British character of this community should also be recognised.
Our government, by outlawing incitement to religious hatred and religious discrimination,
would help to ensure that Muslims, together with other communities, assume their
rightful place in the nations future. Inayat
Bunglawala is secretary of the MCBs media committee. This is an edited version
of his article in the book The Quest for Sanity, published by the MCB, priced
£12.75. To order a copy call 020 8903 9650 or visit www.mcb.org.uk/books |