| Reporting
Diversity: A Checklist 1
This Checklist was developed by journalists, journalism professors and
diversity advisers at a workshop at Carleton University in June, 1995. They exchanged
information about diversity initiatives and how to sustain them; they shared experiences
both positive and negative; they debated with vigor the difficulties and the merits,
the problems and the advantages of greater diversity in both hiring and coverage;
they worked at case studies based on real events; and they drafted this set of
principles to help newsrooms respond better to the changes in Canadian society.
They would like to share these principles, condensed and formatted as a checklist,
with other newsrooms.
Reporting on DIVERSITY means reflecting all members of the community
in a fair and accurate manner, and applying equal standards of scrutiny for all
groups.
FOR BEAT AND GENERAL REPORTERS
Am I covering all aspects, including positive and negative, of diverse communities?
Am I aware of the power of images
Do I avoid furthering stereotypes by seeking a diverse representation when
interviewing people, no matter
what the story? Are the "labels"
I use to describe people appropriate and necessary, and do they meet the
guidelines of my news organization?
Do I regularly consult a variety of widely representative community
(and minority) newspapers, radio and television programs
and their editors and producers? Do I
involve all resources in our news organization as a way to enrich our coverage?
Do I help keep the diversity dialogue alive
in the newsroom through questions, source suggestions
and requests for explanation about news decisions?
Do I research diverse groups thoroughly, to avoid perpetuating stereotypes?
Do I include questions/allegations of systemic
racism as context to specific stories, whenever I can
do so fairly and responsibly? Am I aware
of factions and agendas within groups so that I do not fall prey to manipulation
by prominent sources?
Do I get my assignment/city editors onside-show them how allowing me time
to do background research will pay
off with better coverage? Do I take the
time to consult peers and editors to gain a balanced overview when in doubt
about the tone of a story?
FOR DESK AND ASSIGNMENT EDITORS
Am I giving reporters the time to develop diverse contacts and pursue a wide
range of stories? Am
I creating a newsroom atmosphere that encourages reporters to move beyond
traditional news gathering?
Am I personally exploring all sources of news, and open to non-traditional
views and voices? Do
our story and photo ideas and our content perpetuate cultural or other stereotypes?
Am I assessing whether our photographs and visuals accurately
reflect the entire community?
Am I watching our use of language for bias?
Am I aware of minority sensitivities before setting and reviewing a style to describe
groups or communities?
Are we under-playing or over-playing a story because of its diversity content?
Is our coverage of the actions of a few stereotyping
an entire group? Am I regularly reviewing
the accumulative impact of our coverage?
FOR SENIOR MANAGEMENT
Are we hiring the most qualified people? And are we making clear what those
qualifications are?
Are we seeking to hire people who can bring diverse perspectives into our newsroom?
Are we looking for candidates in non-traditional
places (e.g., ads in community papers; staff of community papers
or cable television and community radio stations; and
community groups or organizations)? After
hiring, are we supporting and training new employees?
Are we telling schools of journalism what we need?
Are we thinking long-term about recruitment (e.g., organizing job fairs, participating
in high school media literacy programs)?
..SUSTAINING
IT
Is there commitment from the top that diversity is important?
Are we clear what we're prepared to invest to make it happen
(e.g., outreach, assigning, mentoring)?
Are we telling diverse communities that we want their business?
Are we creating opportunities for reporting diversity?
Are we measuring progress regularly? |